Clock image
2 min read

Share this article

A Call for Neutrality in Law Enforcement

A Call for Neutrality

Following the bond hearing for two Canton police officers charged in the death of Frank Tyson, discussions have sparked around the presence of numerous uniformed police officers —including members of the department leadership—attending in a show of support for their colleagues. Tyson died after being left handcuffed in a prone position, pleading for help. Body-worn camera footage shows officers disregarding his cries of “I can’t breathe,” raising critical concerns about the role of culture over training within law enforcement.

When uniformed officers attend these proceedings, it risks being seen by the public as a power play rather than a respectful show of support. It’s crucial to allow the judicial process to work without any undue influence or impression of bias.

Accountability and Public Representation

As I mentioned in my recent Election Day article, law enforcement officers are responsible for maintaining neutrality, both in action and appearance, particularly in public settings. A desire to support fellow officers is valid and meaningful, but it’s best done in civilian attire and on personal time.

Why? Because when officers align themselves with the accused in uniform, it undermines the overarching goal of neutrality and jeopardizes the trust we’re striving so hard to build with our communities.

Beyond Training – Changing Culture

As discussed in my recent article, “Police culture is undermining police use-of-force training and societal expectations,” the culture within law enforcement often overpowers policy and training. We need leaders willing to challenge these ingrained attitudes. A real commitment to empathy, moral reasoning, and self-awareness can help reshape the force to align with public expectations.

Neutrality, empathy, and accountability are cornerstones of modern, humane policing. These values must be championed by leadership at the top of law enforcement agencies, setting the tone for the entire organization. When officers see these principles modeled by their leaders, they are empowered to rebuild community trust and demonstrate integrity in every action they take.

Connect with me on social and let me know your thoughts.

Related Content

Ending DOJ Oversight Places Emphasis on Police Leaders

Ending DOJ Oversight Places Emphasis on Police Leaders

The Department of Justice recently announced plans to abandon federal oversight agreements—known as consent decrees—with several police departments, including those in high-profile jurisdictions such as Minneapolis and Louisville. Some in law enforcement might view...

Federal Authority vs. Community Trust: How Los Angeles Can Navigate a Complex Policing Landscape

Federal Authority vs. Community Trust: How Los Angeles Can Navigate a Complex Policing Landscape

In response to intense protests in Los Angeles following controversial ICE raids, President Trump deployed nearly 4,000 federal troops without local consent, raising significant legal and ethical questions. Jeff Wenninger, leveraging over 30 years of LAPD experience, including the Rodney King riots, explores the delicate balance between federal authority, local policing, and community trust. He discusses historical contexts, legal frameworks, and effective policing strategies to ensure public safety while maintaining essential community relationships.

Inside the Fight to Stop the Next Attack: How Elite Counterterrorism Units Are Quietly Saving Lives

Inside the Fight to Stop the Next Attack: How Elite Counterterrorism Units Are Quietly Saving Lives

In this article, Jeff Wenninger shares insights from his interview with Fox News Digital about the growing threat of vehicle attacks as tools of mass violence. Wenninger highlights the need for early intelligence gathering, proactive infrastructure protection, and cross-agency collaboration at local, state, federal, and international levels. He discusses examples covered in his upcoming book On Thin Ice, including the New Orleans attack and the recent tragedy in Vancouver. The article praises elite counterterrorism units such as NYPD and LAPD for leading by example, blending open-source intelligence monitoring with preventive tactics. Wenninger emphasizes that true public safety is built before the next attack occurs, not after.

Share the Article