Clock image
6 min

Share this article

Preventing School Shootings: Why Lasting Solutions Go Beyond Crisis Response

I joined NewsNation to discuss another tragic school shooting—a stark reminder of what happens when prevention fails. With over three decades in law enforcement, I have learned one critical truth: If we’re responding to a crisis, we’ve failed in the opportunity to prevent it.

🔷 Watch My Full NewsNation Interview Here:

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jeff-wenninger-4247a854_tragedy-in-focus-preventing-school-shootings-activity-7367279550755450881-ASdS?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAuB9lwBax5WKxIWll4EC1ypsQiOD1PskJY

The Harsh Reality We Must Face

When tragedy strikes, our instinctive reaction is often to ask, “How did this happen?” and “What could we have done differently?” Despite significant investments in security measures, improved response strategies, and better protocols, school violence remains painfully frequent. The core issue isn’t our response capability—it’s our lack of proactive intervention.

Consider these sobering statistics:

  • 93% of school shootings are planned well in advance.
  • In 4 out of 5 cases, someone else was aware that the violence was being planned.

These statistics underscore a crucial breakdown—not in our ability to react, but in our system’s failure to identify threats early, intervene effectively, and prevent violence before it unfolds.

During my recent discussion, I highlighted a troubling pattern evident in the Apalachee High School tragedy: The shooter had exhibited clear warning signs beforehand, yet timely intervention, monitoring, or potential legal action never occurred.

As I emphasized during the NewsNation interview:

“We must focus on what leads up to these tragic events. If we’re responding after shots are fired, we’ve already failed. Proactive prevention is the key.”

Prevention First: What It Takes

Prevention must be multifaceted and consistently proactive. There are three critical pillars:

1. Early Intervention & Detection

We must create robust, proactive systems to detect early signs of crisis and provide timely intervention. Effective early warning systems require collaboration between law enforcement, mental health professionals, educators, parents, and the broader community. Early detection involves leveraging technology to proactively monitor social media and digital platforms, where warning signs frequently emerge.

2. Accountability & Consistent Follow-Up

Simply having policies is insufficient; there must be clear accountability and rigorous follow-through. Procedures for identifying and managing potential threats must be consistently enforced, clearly documented, and continuously monitored. Each threat or concern, no matter how minor it may seem initially, requires an immediate and coordinated response.

3. Community & School Collaboration

Trust and effective communication among schools, parents, law enforcement, mental health professionals, and students are foundational to successful prevention. It’s vital to create environments where students and community members feel safe, supported, and empowered to report concerns proactively. Enhanced training and clearly defined protocols can ensure that critical information doesn’t slip through the cracks.

Why Waiting for a Crisis is Not Enough

Historically, our law enforcement approach evolved dramatically after incidents like the 1999 Columbine High School massacre. Before Columbine, police procedure during active shooter situations was to secure the perimeter and wait for SWAT to respond. Columbine fundamentally changed this tactic, prompting law enforcement agencies nationwide to adopt immediate, coordinated responses to active shooters to save lives.

However, despite these tactical advances, deeper systemic issues persist, extending beyond improved response measures. This reality calls for a broader understanding of public safety—one rooted in proactive, systemic approaches to violence prevention.

Addressing the Root Causes

School violence isn’t a singular issue with a singular solution. It requires multifaceted approaches—from better monitoring of social media platforms and stricter gun regulations, particularly regarding minors and those exhibiting violent tendencies, to significantly expanded mental health services. Providing ample mental health resources and timely interventions can address underlying issues before they escalate into crisis situations.

The reality we face in the United States is alarming: we experience 57 times more school shootings than all other G7 countries combined. This troubling statistic isn’t just a number—it clearly illustrates our urgent need to act proactively rather than reactively.

Lessons from Columbine and Beyond

Read The Prologue of “On Thin Ice” For Free

In my book, On Thin Ice: An LAPD Veteran’s Journey to Reimagine Policing, I detail critical turning points in law enforcement strategies—particularly highlighting the 1999 Columbine massacre:

“Columbine fundamentally changed the way police respond to active shooter incidents. Before that tragedy, the accepted procedure was straightforward: secure the perimeter, call in SWAT, and wait. Columbine shattered that mindset, demonstrating the urgent need for law enforcement to initiate immediate, proactive responses in order to save lives. As a result, tactical training evolved significantly—prioritizing rapid response, coordination, and decisive action under extreme stress.”

But despite these tactical improvements, we continue to face critical issues that extend far beyond crisis response strategies alone.

This latest tragedy underscores another pressing, unresolved issue: individuals experiencing serious mental health challenges still have alarmingly easy access to weapons. More than two decades after Columbine—with countless school shootings claiming 553 lives—we continue to struggle with turning these lessons into meaningful legislation and public policy. Our national hesitation to implement actionable, practical solutions reflects deeper challenges, not only within law enforcement but across our entire approach to public safety and community well-being.

While specialized tactical training is essential for managing and mitigating incidents, we must recognize that tactical preparedness alone will never overcome entrenched cultural and systemic barriers. We must address the core issues of mental health support, effective identification of individuals who pose a threat, and accountable gun legislation to foster meaningful and sustainable safety improvements.

From Crisis Response to Lasting Solutions

Long-term safety and lasting change require sustained commitment, proactive leadership, and collaboration at every level—local, state, and federal. A comprehensive approach involves developing and implementing preventive strategies that are specifically tailored to each community’s unique needs and challenges.

This is not a responsibility that falls solely on law enforcement. Educators, parents, mental health professionals, legislators, and students themselves must actively participate in creating a safe and nurturing environment. We must commit to working together, forging partnerships, and building trust that makes our schools genuinely safe.

Our children’s lives depend on our willingness to proactively identify and address threats before they manifest into tragedies. Our communities deserve better than repeated cycles of reactive measures after violence has already occurred.

Your Voice Matters

Let’s keep this critical dialogue moving forward. I’d genuinely like to hear from you:

What specific proactive strategies do you believe we must prioritize to create safer schools and stronger, healthier communities?

Together, our collective voices and actions can lead to the systemic, lasting change our children deserve.

Connect with me and let’s start the conversations.

Read the Prologue FOR FREE!

On Thin Ice book cover

In his book, On Thin Ice, nationally recognized law enforcement expert Jeff Wenninger offers a transformative blueprint for rebuilding trust and collaboration between officers and the communities they serve.

    Related Content

    Ending DOJ Oversight Places Emphasis on Police Leaders

    Ending DOJ Oversight Places Emphasis on Police Leaders

    The Department of Justice recently announced plans to abandon federal oversight agreements—known as consent decrees—with several police departments, including those in high-profile jurisdictions such as Minneapolis and Louisville. Some in law enforcement might view...

    Federal Authority vs. Community Trust: How Los Angeles Can Navigate a Complex Policing Landscape

    Federal Authority vs. Community Trust: How Los Angeles Can Navigate a Complex Policing Landscape

    In response to intense protests in Los Angeles following controversial ICE raids, President Trump deployed nearly 4,000 federal troops without local consent, raising significant legal and ethical questions. Jeff Wenninger, leveraging over 30 years of LAPD experience, including the Rodney King riots, explores the delicate balance between federal authority, local policing, and community trust. He discusses historical contexts, legal frameworks, and effective policing strategies to ensure public safety while maintaining essential community relationships.

    Share the Article